INTRODUCTORY MUSING
Sitting in on Intermedia, I still
need to introduce myself. Hello, I am Cindy;
I work with biology majors on their senior experience. I am here to learn more about the
possibilities and techniques to disseminate their work to audiences beyond the
readers of research papers or honors theses.
My posts will reflect the works we read in class through a non-fiction
lens.
afternoon, a
story seems as especially appropriate choice for me as it was first presented
as a demonstration piece for Storyspace at a computing conference on hypertext
in 1987. In the days before the World Wide Web, we accessed the net to look at
files we already knew of from colleagues’ emails or print journal articles. The files were fully text. To find related material required either a
direct link or a fairly sophisticated rummaging about in a file. Security was light, but users were almost all
professional programmers. This was fine;
we were accustomed to letters or phone calls or article in print journals. Information came in a linear fashion. We debated whether to put footnotes on the same
page as the reference or at the end of a piece.
Email exchanges, begun in 1982, had already established traditions of
maintaining the same subject line and adding new material at the top of an
exchange like piling up in a continuous stretch just as our fan-folded paper
emerged from printers.
Causality and time were not the only relationships in
storytelling, non-linear narratives Character viewpoint as described by “[t]he Rashomon effect…[from Kurosawa’s 1950 film where]
the subjectivity of perception on recollection, by which observers of an event
are able to produce substantially different but equally plausible accounts of
it” has a strong tradition in storytelling, as does the alternative eventualities
accessed through a character’s thoughts in Ambrose Bierce’s “An Occurrence atOwl Creek Bridge” of 1890. The methodology used in the literary
criticism of afternoon by Jill Walkerin “Piecing together and tearing apart: finding the story in Michael Joyce’s afternoon” draws on an even earlier tradition that goes back millennia, but which became
concrete with the advent of printing.
[I] “haven’t sat down and created a beautiful on-line syllabus yet with links to all the
resources I want the students to see. Well, instead I’m creating a Talmud-style
resource — which is to say, it’s not organized in a linear fashion. Neither is the Web.
Neither is my mind. But the blog, being Web-based, is searchable — and so is my mind”.
The move to a webpage adds more layers, more linkages, more ways to embrace a holy duty. It was inevitable.
Will this hold true in all non-fiction realms?
Mathematically, a line, a linear representation is described as one-dimensional. Adding information to either side defines a plane, a 2-dimensional construct as in Abbot’s Flatland. (See the External links .) Do the additional links to an ever-widening scope of information carry us to further dimensions as in Dionys Burger’s Sphereland? Or do they merely fill in the details on the plane? Do hyperlinks and Intermedia techniques give us hyperspace and increased understanding, or do they obfuscate the plane of knowledge?
For fun using some
simple special effects in a short movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment